MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388474970 · doi:10.3920/9789086867608_079

Aleutian mink disease virus in furbearing mammals in Nova Scotia, Canada

2012· book-chapter· en· W4388474970 on OpenAlexaffabout
A. Farid

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Department of Agriculture
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaMinkGeographyNova (rocket)ZoologyBiologyVirologyArchaeologyEcologyEngineeringAeronautics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presence of Aleutian mink disease virus (AMDV) was tested in 466 wild animals of 12 furbearing species that were trapped in 10 Nova Scotia counties. DNA was extracted from cell-free spleen homogenates by magnetic beads and presence of the virus was tested for by PCR using two primer pairs, each with three DNA volumes. Anti-viral antibodies in spleen homogenates were also tested by counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIEP) in duplicate. Positive PCR or CIEP samples were detected in 96.9% of 64 mink, 70.5% of 61 weasels, 25.0% of 8 skunks, 18.2% of 11 otters, 10.6% of 85 raccoons and 10.0% of 20 bobcats. Samples of six fishers, 24 coyotes, 25 red foxes, 58 beavers, 45 squirrels and 59 muskrats were negative. Anti-viral antibodies were detected in 16 (25%) of the mink and one of the skunk samples, possibly due to the low antibody titer in spleen homogenates. All CIEP positive animals were also PCR positive, except for three mink and one skunk which were PCR negative. This observation could be the manifestation of persistent antibody production and short-lived viral replication which are signatures of AMDV pathogenesis. The numbers of samples amplified by the two primer pairs were significantly different, suggesting that PCR amplification failure of CIEP positive animals could be the result of differences in the sequence of viruses circulating in different animals. The results imply that the combination of CIEP and PCR using multiple primers would increase the accuracy of detecting AMDV exposure in wild animal species. Infected animals were present in all counties from which samples were collected. The high proportion of animals of so many species across the province carrying AMDV has important epidemiological ramifications and could pose a serious threat to ranched mink as well as susceptible wild animal species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnimal Disease Management and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207