Pharmacists’ perspectives on psilocybin in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> Psilocybin is the main psychoactive component of a naturally occurring psychedelic organism commonly referred to as "magic mushrooms." Existing literature demonstrates beneficial neurologic effects in treatment-resistant depression, cancer-associated depression and anxiety, and substance use. The evidence base for psilocybin use is on the rise with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration owing to a resurgence in clinical research. As such, pharmacists need to be adequately equipped to navigate questions from consumers and care providers. There is currently no literature describing pharmacists' perspectives on psilocybin. Evaluating pharmacists' knowledge, experiences, and opinions about psilocybin may yield beneficial and applicable data to develop educational programs and clinical tools and guide psilocybin policy making. <h3>Objective</h3> The objective of this study was to evaluate the interest and opinions of pharmacists on psilocybin as an emerging therapeutic option. <h3>Methods</h3> Licensed pharmacists in Canada were invited to participate in an anonymous, online, 44-item survey aimed at evaluating pharmacists' experiences, knowledge, and attitudes toward psilocybin. Recruitment for the study was done through multiple Canadian pharmacy association newsletters and via LinkedIn. <h3>Results</h3> Results showed that 73% of pharmacists lacked formal education about psilocybin. Forty percent of pharmacists had conversations about psilocybin less than once a month whereas 60% of pharmacists have never received questions about psilocybin. Furthermore, pharmacists are not comfortable with their knowledge with making recommendations (75%), monitoring (57%), or recommending doses of psilocybin (64%) to patients. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Pharmacists are open to embracing a role in psilocybin therapy and dispensing. Creation of clinical practice guidelines and increased accessibility to education materials are necessary to supplement pharmacists' knowledge on psilocybin and improve their confidence when advising patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".