MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388517342 · doi:10.1055/s-0043-1765291

Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided End-Cutting Fine-Needle Biopsy (FNB) Needles For Tissue Sampling of Abdominal and Mediastinal Lymphadenopathies: A Prospective Multicentre Series

2023· article· en· W4388517342 on OpenAlexaff
Kareem Khalaf, Silvia Carrara, Daoud Rahal, Tommy Rizkala, Glenn Koleth, M. Andreozzi, Benedetto Mangiavillano, A. Facciorusso, Marco Spadaccini, Matteo Colombo, Alessandro Fugazza, Roberta Maselli, Cesare Hassan, Alessandro Repici

Bibliographic record

VenueEndoscopy · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEndoscopic ultrasoundRadiologyBiopsySampling (signal processing)Fine needle biopsyEndoscopyProspective cohort studyAdverse effectSurgeryFine-needle aspirationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims The role of the newer EUS-fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles in lymphadenopathies (LA) is still underevaluation. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and the adverse event rate of EUS-FNB indiagnosing LA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndoscopySame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207