PSX-8 Effect of Feeding Additional Whey Protein to Senior Labrador Retrievers for Maintaining Lean Mass and Minimizing Inflammation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We previously reported increases in lean mass and lean:fat ratio in senior Labrador Retrievers fed a commercial whey protein supplement after a 26-week trial with exercise regimen. Further work on this project examined the impacts of this supplement on immunity and inflammation. Thirty-six senior (>7 yr) Labrador Retrievers received a basal diet meeting AAFCO crude protein (CP) requirements (45g/1,000 kcal, 18% CP on DM basis) and were randomly assigned to one of three supplements: 1) an additional 22.5 g CP/1,000 kcal (27% CP on DM basis) sourced from hydrolyzed pea protein isolate (Pea); 2) additional 22.5 g CP/1,000 kcal (27% CP on DM basis) sourced from whey protein (Whey; Hilmar Protelyze Pet; Hilmar, CA) or 3) poultry fat and sucrose to equalize calories but provide no additional CP (Control). All dogs participated in an exercise regimen consisting of twice weekly 2.2 km runs. Blood samples were collected via jugular venipuncture at week 0 (baseline) and week 26 (end of trial) for analysis of cytokines (IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, NGF-β, IFN-γ, TNF-α, MCP-1, VEGFA, and SCF) and immune cell proliferation. Cytokines were measured with Luminex MAGPIX analyzer. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from whole blood, plated, challenged with pokeweed mitogen. Proliferation was evaluated with a 5-bromo-2’-deoxyuridine proliferation assay kit. Gait analysis was evaluated at weeks 0 (baseline), 4, 8, 16 and 26 using a Gait4Dogs pressure walkway (CIR Systems, Inc; Franklin, NJ). Gait data were processed to generate a FRK Total Gait Inflammation Index, calculated by the sum of the differences from the ideal scores for gait lameness score, total pressure index, step/stride ratio, and hind reach. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc adjustments. We observed increases in IL-12 (P = 0.004), MCP-1 (P = 0.04), VEGFA (P = 0.05), and SCF (P = 0.04) in Control vs Whey at week 26, with Pea intermediate. Spontaneous immune cell proliferation was less in both Pea and Whey compared with Control (P < 0.01). Proliferation after challenge was less in Whey compared with Pea (P = 0.05), with Control intermediate. The FRK Total Gait Inflammation Index significantly increased after exercise in Control and Pea dogs, but not Whey (P < 0.01). Scores of Control dogs remained increased compared with Whey dogs from weeks 4 to 26 (P < 0.01). Dietary supplementation with whey protein at 1.5 x AAFCO minimum proved beneficial for Labrador Retrievers by maintaining more lean mass with improved lean/fat ratio, reduced inflammatory biomarkers, immune cell proliferation, and FRK Total Gait Inflammation Index after an exercise regimen when compared with seniors only consuming a 18% protein basal diet. Supplemental whey protein may better maintain senior dogs experiencing chronic inflammation from aging or disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".