MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388530534 · doi:10.1093/jas/skad281.283

26 The Kisspeptin Knockout Pig: a New Model for Dissecting Mechanisms Controlling Reproduction

2023· article· en· W4388530534 on OpenAlexaff
Clay A Lents, Julio M. Flórez, Kyra Martins, Jonathan R. Bostrom, Paula Rodriquez-Villamil, Felipe Ledur Ongaratto, Abe Huisman, Sabreena Larson, Daniel F Ahern, Caitlin E Ross, Dorothy H Elsken, Robert A. Cushman, Brett R. White, Tad S. Sonstegard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsHendrix Genetics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKisspeptinBiologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineKnockout mouseEstrous cycleHypothalamusOvulationHormoneReceptorGeneticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The biological role of kisspeptin in the reproduction of swine has been far less studied than in other species. In the porcine hypothalamus, kisspeptin is coexpressed with neurokinin B and dynorphin in KNDy neurons. Although kisspeptin-stimulated secretion of gonadotropin hormones in gilts was established early, increased expression of hypothalamic KISS1 was only recently confirmed to be associated with puberty and cyclicity in pigs. Gene knockout (KO) models to study kisspeptin in livestock did not exist until TALEN gene editing technology was used to knockout KISS1R in pigs, resulting in a hypogonadotropic-hypogonadal (HH) phenotype that caused pubertal failure. Little is known about the reproductive physiology of KISS1R KO pigs, except that exogenous follicle-stimulating hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone only partially restored gonadal development in boars. To further explore the biological function of kisspeptin and its receptor in swine, we recently used CRISPR/cas9-ribonucleoproteins to knockout KISS1 in pigs (10.3389/fgene.2022.1078991). A total of 684 zygotes were injected resulting in 69 piglets with 58% bearing KISS1 KO alleles (KISS1-/-). The proportion of KISS1-/- alleles did not affect BW or ADG in these mosaic founder pigs. Two boars and 2 gilts with complete KISS1 KO exhibited HH and failed to become pubertal. Germ and Sertoli cells were disorganized in small seminiferous tubules. Mating mosaic F0 pigs (frequency of KISS1-/-, 35 to 88%) resulted in 170 F1 piglets with KISS1-/- alleles observed in a Mendelian frequency. These KISS1-/- pigs displayed normal BW growth during development but were also HH. Ovarian development of KISS1-/- gilts was arrested at a juvenile state, although antral follicles were present. The KISS1-/- boars lacked testicular development and had dramatically reduced concentrations of androgens and skatole, suggesting the lack of boar taint in their meat. Importantly, KISS1 and KISS1R are expressed in ovarian, uterine and testicular tissue; however, the direct role of kisspeptin in these reproductive organs remains unknown in livestock. These KISS1-/- pigs provide a unique animal model that opens new avenues for understanding the role of kisspeptin and gonadotropin hormones in regulation of reproductive development and function in pigs as well as livestock in general. These animals facilitate our ability to explore questions such as: 1) how KNDy neurons function and control gonadotropin pulses or 2) what role does KISS1 play in the development and function of the ovary, uterus and testis in domestic animals. Some of these questions have heretofore only been addressable with difficult surgical modifications, and therefore, KISS1-/- pigs represent an alternative to painful procedures in livestock research. Pursuing these fundamental studies is expected to lead to methods that restore fertility in KISS1-/- pigs. This, in turn, could provide new possibilities for the elimination of surgical castration from pork production. The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology→French-language works237,207→