Hydrocarbon Generation and Residue Features of Ediacaran High-Maturity Source Rocks and Their Significance in Gas Exploration in Sichuan Basin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Evaluating residual hydrocarbons is crucial for assessing shale oil and gas reservoirs, significantly impacting resource evaluation and exploration prospects. Previously regarded as lacking hydrocarbon generation potential, the Ediacaran Dengying Formation (Fm) microbial dolomite in the Sichuan Basin has been re-evaluated for its hydrocarbon generation capabilities. While understanding source rock characteristics is vital for petroleum resource assessment, a comprehensive analysis of the dolomite’s source rocks, encompassing hydrocarbon generation and residual features, remains undocumented. In this study, we thoroughly analyze the total organic carbon and vitrinite reflectance and extensively utilize pyrolysis analysis, gas chromatography and isotopic analysis of the organic kerogen from the Ediacaran Dengying Fm dolomite samples. The findings affirm that the Ediacaran Dengying Fm dolomite indeed serves as a source rock with moderate hydrocarbon generation and residue capabilities. This microbial dolomite was formed in a reducing marine environment with high salinity. Characterized by an averaging TOC of 0.82%, the kerogen is primarily identified as type I, with a minor presence of type II, and underwent thermal maturation up to the post-maturity stage. Throughout its geological history, the maximum intensities for hydrocarbon generation and residues were 4.5 × 107 t/km2 and 3.2 × 107 t/km2, respectively. Additionally, cumulatively generated and residual hydrocarbon quantities amounted to 2.7 × 1012 t and 1.67 × 1012 t, respectively. This study indicates significant exploration potential for the Ediacaran Dengying Fm microbial dolomite. Consequently, the central region in the Sichuan Basin has been identified as a promising area for future exploration endeavors. Our study provides valuable insights for the understanding of shale gas exploration in high-maturity source rock areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".