Transductive Meta-Learning with Enhanced Feature Ensemble for Few-shot Semantic Segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper addresses few-shot semantic segmentation and proposes a novel transductive end-to-end method that overcomes three key problems affecting performance. First, we present a novel ensemble of visual features learned from pretrained classification and semantic segmentation networks with the same architecture. Our approach leverages the varying dis-criminative power of these networks, resulting in visual features that capture rich and diverse information at different depths. Secondly, the pretrained semantic segmentation network serves as a base class extractor, which significantly reduces false positives. Thirdly, a transductive meta-learning method addresses the prediction by first learning the relationship between labeled and unlabeled data points with matching support foreground to query features (intra-class similarity) and then applying this knowledge to predict on the unlabeled query image (intra-object similarity), which simultaneously learns propagation and false positive suppression. To evaluate our method, we performed experiments on benchmark datasets, and the results demonstrate significant improvement, with minimal trainable parameters 2.98M. Specifically, using Resnet-101, we achieve state-of-the-art performance for both 1-shot and 5-shot Pascal-5i , as well as on 1-shot and 5-shot COCO-20i .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".