Numerical Simulation of Aeroacoustics Generated by Flow around 30P30N High-lift Aerofoil using Hybrid CFD/BEM approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we have performed the acoustic simulation generated by the flow around the 30P30N airfoil with a slat and a flap by means of Boundary element Method using quadrupole sources extracted from the unsteady CFD simulations. The CFD simulations are performed using Ansys Fluent with LES Dynamic Model, and compressible flow fields have been solved. The attack angles of the airfoil are 5.5 and 9.5 degree. When the BEM calculation for the acoustic propagation was performed, the FMM (Fast Multipole Method) and FMBEM were used to calculate quickly the contributions from the quadrupole sources and acoustic propagation, reflection and diffraction on the boundaries, those are the walls of the 30P30N airfoil. The results of the acoustic simulations show a relatively good agreement with the experimental data and other researchers' simulation results. The directivities of the acoustic pressure for the primary peak frequency are shown and they depend on the attack angle of the airfoil. The far-field SPL also depends on the attack angle of the airfoil and decreases as the attack angle increases. We have also investigated the quadrupole sources in frequency domain, and the results showed that the quadrupole sources at far-field SPL peak frequencies near the wake of slat and the suction side of the main element of the airfoil are stronger than those in other regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".