MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388551030 · doi:10.1093/bjsopen/zrad109

Total adrenalectomy <i>versus</i> subtotal adrenalectomy for bilateral pheochromocytoma: meta-analysis

2023· review· en· W4388551030 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBJS Open · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdrenalectomyMedicineSurgeryMeta-analysisPheochromocytomaRetrospective cohort studyUrologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Bilateral pheochromocytomas are rare and often heritable. Total adrenalectomy leads to a definitive oncological cure, with subsequent definitive hypocortisolism. Subtotal adrenalectomy is a possible alternative. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of total adrenalectomy and subtotal adrenalectomy on bilateral pheochromocytoma in terms of post-surgical rate of recurrence, metastatic disease, and steroid dependence. METHODS: Systematic searches in the bibliographic databases PubMed, Embase, and Europe PMC were performed for 1945 to 1 June 2023. PRISMA guidelines were followed and the PICO strategy was applied to English-language studies comparing subtotal adrenalectomy with total adrenalectomy. A random-effects model was used to assess the different outcomes for studies with high heterogeneity. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions ('ROBINS-I') tool were used to assess quality and risk of bias. RESULTS: From a total of 12 909 studies, 1202 patients (from 10 retrospective studies) were eligible for the meta-analysis. In six studies, including 1176 patients, the recurrence rate after subtotal adrenalectomy and total adrenalectomy was 14.1 versus 2.6 per cent respectively (OR 4.91, 95 per cent c.i. 1.30 to 18.54; P = 0.020; I2 72 per cent). In nine studies, including 1124 patients, the rate of post-surgical steroid dependence was 93.3 versus 11.6 per cent after total adrenalectomy and subtotal adrenalectomy respectively (OR 0.003, 95 per cent c.i. 0.0003 to 0.03; P < 0.00001; I2 66 per cent). Based on two studies, including 719 patients, no differences were evident regarding the occurrence of post-surgery metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: Subtotal adrenalectomy leads to less post-surgical primary adrenal insufficiency, but leads to a higher postoperative recurrence rate. Future prospective randomized studies, with clear eligibility criteria, are needed to confirm these results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.011
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.490
GPT teacher head0.489
Teacher spread0.001 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it