High‐Efficiency GaAs Solar Cells Grown on Porous Germanium Substrate with PEELER Technology
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
III–V solar cells are mainly grown on GaAs or Ge substrate, which significantly contributes to the final cost and affects the sustainable use of these rare materials. A so‐called PEELER process is developed, in which a porosification technique is used to create a weak layer between a Ge substrate and the epitaxial layers. This method enables the separation of the grown layers, allowing for the subsequent reuse of germanium and a reduction in the environmental and economic cost of optoelectronic devices. Technology validation using the device performance is important to assess the technology interest. For this purpose, the performance of 22 nondetached single‐junction GaAs photovoltaic cells grown and manufactured on porosified 100 mm Ge wafer without antireflection coating is fabricated and compared. All the cells exhibit comparable performance to state‐of‐the‐art GaAs solar cells (grown or Ge or GaAs) with high efficiency (21.8% ± 0.78%) and thereby demonstrate the viability of growing high‐performance optoelectronic devices on detachable Ge films.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it