Masses, revised radii, and a third planet candidate in the ‘Inverted’ planetary system around TOI-1266
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Is the population of close-in planets orbiting M dwarfs sculpted by thermally driven escape or is it a direct outcome of the planet formation process? A number of recent empirical results strongly suggest the latter. However, the unique architecture of the TOI-1266 system presents a challenge to models of planet formation and atmospheric escape given its seemingly ‘inverted’ architecture of a large sub-Neptune (Pb = 10.9 d, $R_{p,b}=2.62\pm 0.11\, \mathrm{R}_{\oplus }$) orbiting interior to that of the system’s smaller planet (Pc = 18.8 d, $R_{p,c}=2.13\pm 0.12\, \mathrm{R}_{\oplus }$). Here, we present revised planetary radii based on new TESS and diffuser-assisted ground-based transit observations, and characterize both planetary masses using a set of 145 radial velocity measurements from HARPS-N ($M_{p,b}=4.23\pm 0.69\, \mathrm{M}_{\oplus }, M_{p,c}=2.88\pm 0.80\, \mathrm{M}_{\oplus }$). Our analysis also reveals a third planet candidate (Pd = 32.3 d, $M_{p,d}\sin {i} = 4.59^{+0.96}_{-0.94}\, \mathrm{M}_{\oplus }$), which if real, would form a chain of near 5:3 period ratios, although the system is likely not in a mean motion resonance. Our results indicate that TOI-1266 b and c are among the lowest density sub-Neptunes around M dwarfs and likely exhibit distinct bulk compositions of a gas-enveloped terrestrial (Xenv,b = 5.5 ± 0.7 per cent) and a water-rich world (WMFc = 59 ± 14 per cent), which is supported by hydrodynamic escape models. If distinct bulk compositions are confirmed through atmospheric characterization, the system’s unique architecture would represent an interesting test case of inside-out sub-Neptune formation at pebble traps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".