Membrane contact site detection (MCS-DETECT) reveals dual control of rough mitochondria–ER contacts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identification and morphological analysis of mitochondria-ER contacts (MERCs) by fluorescent microscopy is limited by subpixel resolution interorganelle distances. Here, the membrane contact site (MCS) detection algorithm, MCS-DETECT, reconstructs subpixel resolution MERCs from 3D super-resolution image volumes. MCS-DETECT shows that elongated ribosome-studded riboMERCs, present in HT-1080 but not COS-7 cells, are morphologically distinct from smaller smooth contacts and larger contacts induced by mitochondria-ER linker expression in COS-7 cells. RiboMERC formation is associated with increased mitochondrial potential, reduced in Gp78 knockout HT-1080 cells and induced by Gp78 ubiquitin ligase activity in COS-7 and HeLa cells. Knockdown of riboMERC tether RRBP1 eliminates riboMERCs in both wild-type and Gp78 knockout HT-1080 cells. By MCS-DETECT, Gp78-dependent riboMERCs present complex tubular shapes that intercalate between and contact multiple mitochondria. MCS-DETECT of 3D whole-cell super-resolution image volumes, therefore, identifies novel dual control of tubular riboMERCs, whose formation is dependent on RRBP1 and size modulated by Gp78 E3 ubiquitin ligase activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".