Case report of selumetinib as a novel therapy in a neurofibromatosis type 2-associated ependymoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report partial response (PR) to novel therapy with selumetinib in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). A 25-year-old male presented with bilateral vestibular schwannomas, spinal cord intramedullary ependymomas, cranial and spinal meningiomas, spinal nerve root mixed schwannoma-neurofibromas, and peripheral nerve sheath tumors. He tested negative for germline NF2 , SWItch/sucrose non-fermentable-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily B member 1 ( SMARCB1) , and leucine zipper-like transcription regulator 1 ( LZTR1) mutations. Molecular analysis of a resected cervical spine schwannoma-neurofibroma demonstrated an isolated somatic SMARCB1 mutation. Due to progression of all tumors, he was treated medically with both everolimus (10 mg/day) and selumetinib (25 mg/kg twice a day), but he rapidly transitioned to selumetinib monotherapy due to everolimus toxicity. 3 months of treatment resulted in PR in one spinal ependymoma and stable disease in other tumors. This PR was quantified by the differences in units of intensity in pre- and post-treatment magnetic resonance image. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case for using selumetinib in NF2-associated tumors or ependymomas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".