Satisfaction Level of the Academic Community with the Implementation of WEB-Based SIAKAD IAKN Tarutung (Comparison: Implementation of SIAKAD UIN-Sumatera Utara)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SIAKAD is a system developed to meet the needs of the academic community as a whole. Implementation of SIAKAD is based on three satisfaction indicators: access speed, ease of access and timeliness. Qualitative and quantitative methods on SERVQUAL analysis. Then analysed with statistical data as a comparison of satisfaction implementation in each academic community in IAKN and UIN universities. This study shows that the purpose of satisfaction affects the value of the academic community in providing an excellent and destructive impact on the value of work in higher education as well as the involvement of various elements in higher education to determine how the academic information system (SIAKAD) should be built to meet the expectations of its users and following SIAKAD standards in general in higher education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it