Exploring Cultural Landscape Values in Riverfront Development: An Examination of the Shatt Al-Arab Riverfront in Basra, Iraq
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cultural landscapes embody historical significance, illustrating the interplay between humankind and nature over time.These landscapes epitomize the social and cultural history of regions, vividly portraying societal characteristics, events, and activities.They express the fundamental values intrinsic to these societies, encapsulating human development, and forging a connection between populations and their historical past.Cultural landscapes enhance the local cultural character, fostering human interaction on physical, sensory, and symbolic levels.They mirror lifestyle philosophies and the ideologies behind place creation, providing a consistent representation of events and locations throughout history.A knowledge gap has been identified concerning the definition of cultural landscapes and their values that could potentially foster the development of riverfronts.This paper endeavors to bridge this gap by investigating the values of cultural landscapes across various categories and their correlation with riverfront development.The research adopts a descriptive-analytical methodology, with an extensive review of previous literature to construct a theoretical framework.The study relies on the vocabulary derived from this framework to explore the realization of these values through an examination of a section of the Shatt al-Arab riverfront in Basra city, Iraq.The research verifies the efficacy of cultural landscape value indicators in riverfront development.These include spatial values represented by context, location, and historical influence, tangible and intangible heritage values, functional values pertaining to spiritual and recreational functions, social values embodied in social integration and community participation, and aesthetic values associated with place memories, elements of natural and manufactured landscapes.Cultural values are manifested in landmarks, buildings, and cultural spaces.Cultural landscape values have been found to contribute to sustainable development, steering and revitalizing numerous cultural activities and events.This has fostered enhanced vitality, deepened the sense of identity and place values, rendered the city globally competitive, and augmented its cultural value.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".