MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388588341 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noad179.0959

QOL-07. RESISTING DECLINES IN FUNCTIONAL FITNESS: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS FROM THE RESIST TRIAL

2023· article· en· W4388588341 on OpenAlexaff
Melanie R. Keats, Chris M. Blanchard, Jonathon R. Fowles, Scott A. Grandy, Jodi Langley, Alex LeBlanc, Heather F. Neyedli, Adrienne Weeks, Mary MacNeil

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Canadian institutionsAcadia UniversityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapyAttritionGrip strengthCircuit trainingAdverse effectRandomized controlled trialInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Few studies have evaluated the efficacy of exercise (EX) in mitigating the functional decline experienced by glioblastoma patients receiving steroids. Here we report preliminary findings on the impact of a tailored ~12-week circuit-based resistance training (CRT) program on functional fitness in glioblastoma patients on treatment. Patient accrual, adherence, and safety was evaluated throughout. Functional status (Short Physical Performance Battery) and grip strength were assessed at baseline and post-study. Depending on the treatment protocol, EX participants completed 3-6 weeks of in-person training followed by 6-9 weeks of home-based, Zoom facilitated training (3-4, 25–30-minute sessions/week). From March 2022 to May 2023, 33 glioblastoma patients were screened and met eligibility criteria, 24 expressed interest, and 15 subsequently agreed to participate (45% accrual). Participants were randomly allocated to either the EX (n = 7) or wait-list control (CON = 8) group. Ten participants (EX = 5; CON = 5) have completed the study with 1 CON ongoing (27% attrition; 2 withdrawn; 2 died) and incomplete fitness data for 1 EX participant. Three serious, unrelated adverse events were recorded, including 2 disease related deaths and 1 hospitalization. Adherence to in-person EX sessions was 96%. While not significant, preliminary efficacy data suggests that EX participants were more likely to maintain or mitigate losses in lower body function (CON (Mchange=-1.0, SD = 2.6); EX (Mchange = 0; SD = 1.3), t(7)=0.943, p > 0.05, d = 0.49) and grip strength (CON (Mchange=-5.94kg, SD = 9.15; EX (Mchange = 0.4kg, SD = 5.75), t(7)=0.269, p > 0.05, d = 0.83). Findings show that glioblastoma patients on active treatment are willing and able to safely engage in CRT. Participants were adherent to in-person CRT sessions, however self-reported home-based CRT was low, with many participants disengaging from EX. While this may be attributed to declining health and worsening fatigue related to ongoing treatments, additional study is needed to explore strategies to improve adherence to home-based EX sessions as in-person sessions are not always feasible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesFrench-language works237,207