MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388588548 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noad179.0044

BIOM-33. TRNA FRAGMENTS IN PLASMA EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES FROM HIGH GRADE GLIOMA PATIENTS, POTENTIAL BIOMARKERS?

2023· article· en· W4388588548 on OpenAlexaff
Adrienne Weeks, Thomson Phinney, Ali H. Alwadei, Gabriel Wajnberg, Jae Ho Han, Simi Chacko, K.C. Atwood, Jeremy Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsAtlantic Cancer Research InstituteDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransfer RNABiologyRNATranslation (biology)Small RNAEpigeneticsExtracellular vesiclesComputational biologyCell biologyMolecular biologyCancer researchBiochemistryGeneMessenger RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Transfer RNA (tRNA) are non-coding RNAs responsible for bringing the amino acids to the ribosome during translation. Recent studies in cancer have shown that fragments (tRFs) derived from tRNA cleavage serve regulatory roles in epigenetics, signalling and translation. tRFs are also released from cells bound to proteins and can be found in extracellular vesicles to perform some aspects of paracrine signalling. Utilizing high throughput small RNA sequencing we have identified over 750 uniquely or multi-mapped (6.9% of total sRNA mapped reads) tRNA and tRFs in extracellular vesicles of high-grade glioma patient plasma (IDH-WT). Consistent with novel literature in other cancers there was a general trend to decreased expression of tRNA and tRFs (n = 76 with FDR < 0.05) in high grade glioma plasma EVs compared to controls. However, further analysis of tRFs reveals a much more complex story, as fragment distribution differs between cancer and controls. tRNAs and tRFs may serve as important biomarkers and regulators with therapeutic potential in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicRNA modifications and cancer→French-language works237,207→