CTIM-27. PERIPHERAL BIOMARKER ANALYSIS OF T CELL-MEDIATED COLLAGEN REMODELING CORRELATES WITH TUMOR RESPONSES IN A PHASE IIA TRIAL OF VACCINE IMMUNOTHERAPEUTIC CANDIDATE (VBI-1901)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigens have been reported in over 90% of GBMs. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are most frequently directed against the gB and pp65 antigens, respectively, which are immunogenic targets in a CMV-based GBM immunotherapeutic. First-recurrent GBM patients with KPS³70 received VBI-1901 (a gB/pp65 enveloped virus-like particle [eVLP]) adjuvanted with GM-CSF intradermally (NCT03382977). Patients received VBI-1901 q4w, with serologic immune-monitoring q2w after each vaccination and surveillance brain MRI scans q6w. Among 16 patients treated with the highest (10µg dose) of VBI-1901, the mOS was 12.9 months with a 12-month OS rate of 62.5%. T cell-mediated collagen remodeling is necessary for T cell migration and activity. The peripheral C4G biomarker targets granzyme-B-cleaved type IV collagen, which is associated with T cell infiltration and has previously been shown to potentially identify recurrent GBM patients responding to nivolumab and bevacizumab. Here, C4G was measured in available plasma samples from patients with progressive disease (PD) (n = 9), stable disease (SD) (n = 5) or partial tumor responses (PR) (n = 2) prior to (baseline) and after (cycle 1-4) treatment with VBI-1901. Although numerically lower in patients with PD, there were no differences in baseline levels of C4G among the groups. However, there were statistically significant increases in C4G levels in the 2 patients with PR both after 1st/2nd doses (p = 0.0324) and after 3rd/4th doses (p = 0.0027) of treatment (1st/2nd doses; PD: 7.6ng/mL, SD: 10.0ng/mL, PR: 21.0ng/mL. 3rd/4th doses; PD: 6.1ng/mL, SD: 8.5ng/mL, PR: 16.8ng/mL). On-going analyses are evaluating additional peripheral markers of tumor microenvironment (TME) remodeling. Evaluating the balance of immune infiltration vs. tumor cell growth in patients with brain tumors is challenging and these data suggest a means of assessing this dynamic using a peripheral biomarker. These data may be particularly useful in discerning pseudoprogression associated with T cell infiltration from tumor progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".