MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388590696 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noad179.0862

EXTH-08. IMMUNOTHERAPEUTIC TARGETING OF FIBROBLAST ACTIVATION PROTEIN (FAP) IN TREATMENT REFRACTORY GLIOBLASTOMA USING NOVEL CAR-T CELL THERAPY

2023· article· en· W4388590696 on OpenAlexaff
Nazanin Tatari, Hayget Mohamed Seid Hedad, Andreas Zingg, Ewelina M. Bartoszek, Viviane J. Tschan, Timo Schenker, Marie‐Françoise Ritz, Petar Miletic, Chitra Venugopal, Manina M. Etter, Sheila K. Singh, Heinz Läubli, Gregor Hütter

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibroblast activation protein, alphaChimeric antigen receptorCancer researchU87MedicineStromal cellGliomaAntigenImmunotherapyImmunologyCancerInternal medicineImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common malignant primary adult brain tumor, is characterized by extensive cellular and genetic heterogeneity. The standard of care therapy and clinical trials have not been successful in improving patients’ survival which underscores an urgent need for developing new effective therapies. In silico and in vitro analysis have revealed high level of Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) expression in GBM tissue by multiple cell populations including endothelial cells, fibroblasts, stromal and tumor cells, but not normal brain tissue, making FAP a safe and suitable therapeutic target. As chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) expressing T cells have shown promising results against multiple cancers, we aimed to target FAP in GBM by FAP specific CAR-T cells generated using a novel GMP-ready FAP-CAR construct produced based on a virus-free CAR gene transfer using advanced sleeping beauty transposon technology and pre-clinically test their anti-tumor efficacy. Our data revealed that co-culturing CAR-T cells with FAP+ GBM cells (U87) resulted in increased surface expression of T-cell activation markers. Moreover, FAP CAR-T mediated cytotoxicity against FAP+ GBM cells was also observed in the co-culture of GBM and CAR-T cells. For further validation, the effect of FAP CAR-T cells will be tested on patient-derived GBM organoids. The in vivo efficacy of FAP CAR-T cells is currently under investigation and we anticipate that the treatment of GBM tumor-bearing mice with FAP CAR-Ts results in extended survival and tumor burden reduction. These rigorously obtained data show high level of efficacy for FAP-specific CAR-T cells against GBM suggesting that clinical development of this therapeutic modality can provide a novel therapeutic strategy for GBM patients. Therefore, upon successful completion of the preclinical study, we plan to conduct a phase I dose-escalation trial of autologous FAP-CAR T cells for patients with recurrent Glioblastoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→