MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Characteristics and prognostic implications of pre-shock and normotensive cardiogenic shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry

2023· article· en· W4388594325 on OpenAlexaff
Saurabh D. Patel, David D. Berg, Erin A. Bohula, J G Park, Sean van Diepen, Jason N. Katz, David A. Morrow

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineCardiogenic shockInternal medicineCardiologyShock (circulatory)Myocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Limited data exist regarding the epidemiology and prognostic implications of pre-shock and normotensive cardiogenic shock (CS) states. Moreover, optimal staging of risk for pts with isolated hypotension versus isolated hypoperfusion remains unclear. Purpose We sought to compare characteristics and outcomes of pre-shock states and normotensive CS as compared with conventional CS. Methods The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) is an investigator-initiated multicenter registry of CICUs coordinated by the TIMI Study Group. Consecutive admissions (n=22,869) from 42 centers (2017-2022) were stratified into groups of isolated low CO, isolated hypotension, normotensive CS, and SCAI Stage C CS using criteria in Fig A. Results A total of 1,754 were stratified into one of the four groups: 5% isolated low CO, 9% isolated hypotension, 13% normotensive CS, and 74% SCAI stage C CS. Prior HF was more common in pts w/ isolated low CO (73%) and normotensive CS (60%), compared to pts w/ isolated hypotension (44%) or SCAI stage C CS (55%) (global p<0.001). Overall, in-hospital mortality was 18.4% with marked differences among groups (global p < 0.001; Fig B). Specifically, mortality was significantly lower in those with an isolated low CO or isolated hypotension than among the normotensive CS group (pairwise p [isolated hypotension vs. normotensive CS] = 0.03; Fig B). In contrast, mortality rates among admissions with normotensive CS vs. SCAI stage C CS did not significantly differ (pairwise p=0.08; Fig B). Conclusions Normotensive CS is associated with a >2-fold higher in-hospital mortality compared with isolated hypotension or an isolated low CO state. These findings indicate that the presence of malperfusion, irrespective of hypotension, is associated with worse outcomes in CS. These data may inform refinement of CS staging with respect to pre-shock states.Figure

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→