MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Cardiovascular phenotype of the duchenne muscular dystrophy carrier female rat

2023· article· en· W4388596040 on OpenAlexaff
Attila Kiss, Ladislaus Szabo, D Zakai, Eylem Acar, Christopher Dostal, Karin Zins, Dietmar Abraham, Karlheinz Hilber, Gavin Y. Oudit, Tatiana Marques, Henrique Girão, Bruno K. Podesser

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAustrian Science Fund
KeywordsMedicineDuchenne muscular dystrophyDystrophinInternal medicineElectrical impedance myographyHeart failureCardiac function curveCardiologyDilated cardiomyopathyMuscular dystrophyCardiomyopathyEndocrinologyCardiac fibrosisFibrosisPathologyVasodilation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a lethal, severely progressive muscle-wasting disease. It is an X-linked recessive disease caused by mutations in the DMD gene encoding dystrophin protein and consequently the absence of dystrophin protein synthesis. Besides the skeletal muscle abnormalities, DMD patients are often suffering cardiovascular symptoms include cardiac fibrosis, dilated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, and congestive heart failure. Heterozygous female DMD carriers rarely acquire skeletal muscle symptoms, however the cardiac abnormalities are often underrepresented. There are few studies to date characterizing cardiovascular abnormalities in female DMD carriers and the mechanisms underlying the cardiac manifestations are still not fully known. Aims and Methods: Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the cardiovascular phenotype of 9 months old female DMD carrier rats and compare with age-matched wildtype rats. Objectives included assessment of cardiac function via transthoracic echocardiography, vascular function using wire myography, cardiac fibrosis and dystrophin via histology, mRNA expression of inflammatory markers via RT-qPCR, measurements of ACE1 and ACE2 activity, as well as expression of dystrophin, SERCA, sarcolipin, BAG3, and Connexin43 (Cx43) using western blotting. The cardiac function, vascular endothelial function, ACE1 and ACE2 activity, and collagen deposition in cardiac tissue were similar between the female DMD carrier and wildtype rats. The echocardiography data revealed thinning of the left-ventricular posterior wall indicating trend towards cardiac atrophy and dysfunction (p<0.05). Wire myography data showed trends of impaired endothelium-independent relaxation and hypercontractility, suggesting the potential vascular abnormalities. Histological analysis showed thickening of intima-media layer in coronary arteries, addition to reduced dystrophin staining, further affirming dystrophin loss impairs smooth muscle cell function (p<0.05, respectively). Protein expression of dystrophin, SERCA2, and BAG3 was decreased in female DMD carrier rats in the myocardium. We also found decreased levels of Cx43 at the intercalated discs, with a concomitant increase in the phosphorylation of Serine368 on Cx43 that very often precedes ubiquitination and degradation of Cx43 channels. In agreement, higher levels of the ubiquitin ligase Nedd4 were observed in hearts of female DMD carrier rats, implicating Cx43 degradation in cardiac dysfunction observed in these animals. Conclusions These findings indicate that female DMD carrier rats do not develop severe cardiac systolic dysfunction nor dilated cardiomyopathy at the age of 9 months unlike male DMD rats as previously described(1). However, the female DMD carrier rats begin to manifest tendencies towards cardiac and vascular dysfunction in association with a changes of calcium handling protein and Cx 43 expression in the heart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicMuscle Physiology and Disorders→French-language works237,207→