MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388599782 · doi:10.2118/217340-ms

Limited Entry Liner Completion and Acidizing Design with Consideration of Reservoir Heterogeneity for MRC Wells

2023· article· en· W4388599782 on OpenAlexaff
Huifeng Liu, Wanting Jia, Longlian Cui, Ning Xu, Guobin Yang, Ping Liqiu, Zhangxin Chen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermeability (electromagnetism)PorosityCompletion (oil and gas wells)AnisotropyDistribution (mathematics)Petroleum engineeringGeologyEngineeringComputer scienceGeotechnical engineeringMathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsChemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract MRC (Maximum Reservoir Contact) wells with extra-long laterals (formation contact length>5000m) are drilled in many oilfields in the world to develop tight and thin reservoirs. LEL (Limited Entry Liner) completion and acidizing are an effective technology to stimulate these wells because they distribute the acid uniformly along the long laterals. The design of a distribution of holes in LEL is the key to this technology, especially for reservoirs with high heterogeneity. This study focuses on the optimization of the current LEL completion design strategy by considering the porosity heterogeneity along the lateral and the permeability anisotropy within each segment. Firstly, a model for designing a distribution of holes in LEL is established by incorporating a newly developed model for calculating a post-stimulation equivalent skin factor. Secondly, three LEL completion design strategies are proposed: uniform acid coverage, uniform wormhole length and uniform equivalent skin factor. Thirdly, a real well case is introduced to show the difference between the three strategies in terms of the distribution of holes, generated wormhole length and post-stimulation skin factor. In our new design model, the variances of formation porosity, the differences in acid outlet flow velocity among different segments and the difference in permeability in different directions are considered. This model is used in a horizontal well to achieve uniform post-stimulation equivalent skin factor and the result is compared with those by the other two design strategies. The result from the uniform acid coverage strategy shows that the total number of holes is 198, the length of the generated wormhole is 4.46ft and the equivalent skin factor is -2.88. The result from the uniform wormhole length strategy indicates that fewer holes (totally 135) and a more irregular holes distribution are obtained; the wormhole length is 0.43ft. The result from the uniform equivalent skin factor design strategy shows that the total number of holes is 161; the wormhole length and acid coverage are bigger at the heel but smaller at toe. It also shows that the equivalent skin factor is much bigger (even positive at the heel) than in the other two strategies, which indicates that more acid and consequently more holes should be added at the heel. It is also recommended for an appropriate selection of the three design strategies. Our work is an optimization for LEL completion design based on the current design strategy in the industry, which only aims for uniform acid distribution. A guideline chart of the three design strategies we have proposed is also useful for engineers to select the appropriate LEL design methods based on the specific well conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→French-language works237,207→