MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388599933 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.120

Right ventricular dysfunction after coronary artery bypass grafting

2023· article· en· W4388599933 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas G. Weiss, Jesper K. Jensen, Henrik Vase, Stefan James, S. Thelin, Ivy Susanne Modrau

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRegion Midtjylland
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyEjection fractionArteryBypass graftingAnginaHeart failureMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Impaired right ventricular (RV) function is a frequent echocardiographic finding following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). It is subject of debate whether this finding reflects actual RV dysfunction with clinical impact, or rather limitations of the applied echocardiographic measurements. Purpose We aimed to investigate prevalence of RV dysfunction using currently available echocardiographic measurements, and self-reported physical capacity more than two years after CABG. Materials and methods This pre-specified cross-sectional substudy of the SWEDEGRAFT trial included patients scheduled for follow-up more than two years after elective CABG at our institution. The SWEDEGRAFT trial is an ongoing multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing patency of saphenous vein grafts harvested with "no-touch" and open skeletonized technique. We prospectively assessed RV function with multivariable transthoracic echocardiography. Self-reported physical capacity was assessed using the three items for physical limitation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7) (3 denotes the worst and 15 the best possible physical capacity), as well as NYHA-class. Baseline and procedural data were retrieved from the SWEDEGRAFT trial. Preoperative echocardiographies were systematically reexamined. Results We enrolled 207 patients into our substudy at a median follow-up after CABG of 31.0 (range 24.2-39.9) months. RV function assessed by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) was significantly reduced compared to the preoperative assessment. In contrast, postoperative RV function as assessed by RV fractional area change (FAC) was preserved. Similarly, assessment of three-dimensional RV ejection fraction (3D-RVEF) indicated preserved RV function (mean 49.4 ± 6.3 %). Mean RV global longitudinal strain was -19.7 (±3.6), and mean RV free wall strain was -22.7 (±4.9). At follow-up, assessments of 3D-RVEF and strain modalities were obtainable in 51.7% and 72.4% of patients, respectively. Patient-reported functional capacity was excellent (median score 15, interquartile range 1.5). NYHA-class improved significantly (NYHA-class I preoperative 49.4% vs. postoperative 61.4%, p=0.032). Postoperative median pro-Brain Natiuretic Peptide levels were 163 (interquartile range 195) ng/L. Conclusion RV systolic function was preserved more than two years after CABG when assessed by RV FAC and 3D-RVEF despite significant reduction in TAPSE. These findings likely reflect the increased sphericity of the RV following opening the pericardium during surgery. Our study supports that measurements of longitudinal systolic parameters likely underestimate RV systolic function after CABG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→