Meta-analysis: increased risk of subclinical atherosclerosis in young women after preeclampsia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Preeclampsia leads to a two-to-eight fold increased risk of developing future cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is vital to identify the subgroup of high-risk women who will ultimately develop CVD. Preeclampsia is characterized by systemic endothelial dysfunction with a hyper inflammatory state. In combination with the pregnancy specific hypercholesteraemic state, this may trigger early onset atherosclerosis which could underlie future development of CVD. Purpose This meta-analysis aims to determine the prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis at different age intervals, in young women after preeclamptic pregnancies compared to non-preeclamptic pregnancies. Methods A systematic search identified studies reporting prevalence of atherosclerosis. Only studies including a preeclamptic and non-preeclamptic group using CT or ultrasound scan were included. There was no restriction on follow up duration. All subtypes of atherosclerotic plaque in any maternal vessel were included. Quality of articles was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated with logistic regression as a measure of effect size for the prevalence of any atherosclerotic plaque. The Random effects model pooled odds ratios to produce an overall odds ratio and also stratified data using maternal age and imaged artery. Results Nine studies included 4148 women in total: 1444 (35%) with preeclampsia and 2704 (65%) without preeclampsia. Prevalence of atherosclerosis was higher in women with previous preeclampsia. The overall OR of having atherosclerosis after preeclampsia was 1.67 (95% CI 1.38-2.02) with an I2 of 62%. The odds of atherosclerosis after preeclampsia <40 years of age was 0.64 (0.10-4.32), 40-49 was 1.59 (1.30-1.93) and >50 was 2.67 (1.84-3.89). Conclusion Women with preeclampsia have a significantly increased risk of early-onset atherosclerosis compared to women with healthy pregnancies. This elevated risk starts from 40 years onwards suggestive of accelerated atherosclerosis. Early lifestyle or pharmacological preventive measures should be considered and investigated to reduce CVD burden after preeclamptic pregnancies.Overall resultsTable of odds ratios
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.016 | 0.051 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".