Physiological and haemodynamic differences between peak exercise blood pressure and blood pressure-power output slope in healthy women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background A hypertensive response to exercise (HRE) is considered indicative of increased arterial stiffness (1). However, HRE is common in individuals with high cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) (2), which we hypothesize is due to increased stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (Qc). Purpose This study compared differences in CRF and peak-exercise SV (SVpeak) and Qc (Qcpeak) according to absolute and workload-indexed definitions of exercise hypertension in women. Methods Women free of overt CVD (n=142; 52±8years, BMI: 26.3±4.5kg/m2) underwent exercise cardiac magnetic resonance to quantify SVpeak and Qcpeak, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing to quantify peak VO2, power output (PO) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) responses. SBP-PO slope was determined using linear regression of SBP and PO values obtained every 2-minutes throughout exercise. HRE was defined as peak SBP ≥190mmHg (3), and elevated SBP-PO slope was defined as a slope >90th percentile for sex and age based on previously published values (4). Results 51% and 23% of the cohort met criteria for HRE and elevated SBP-PO slope, respectively, with 16% meeting both criteria. HRE was associated with higher VO2peak (2.03±0.53 vs 1.83±0.44 L/min, P=0.015), peak PO (191±66 vs 167±51 Watts, P=0.014), SVpeak (109±27 vs 98±19 mLs, P=0.008), and Qcpeak (15.1±3.3 vs 13.9±2.8 L/min, P=0.023). In contrast, elevated SBP-PO slope was associated with lower VO2peak (1.57±0.36 vs 2.04±0.48 L/min), peak PO (135±34 vs 192±60Watts) SVpeak (88±13 vs 108±24 mLs) and Qcpeak (12.5±1.8 vs 15.1±3.1 L/min; P<0.001 for all). Overall, the group with HRE and elevated SBP-PO slope had the lowest physical capacity, VO2peak and haemodynamic response to exercise (Figure 1A-D), whilst the opposite trend was seen for those with a HRE and a normal SBP-PO slope. All results remained significant (P<0.05) after adjustment for age, BMI, resting SBP and menopausal status (pre vs peri/post-menopausal). Conclusion Contextualising exercise SBP responses against measures of PO better accounts for confounding from increased Qcpeak, and may improve identification of women with increased arterial stiffness.Figure 1A-D
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".