MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388618767 · doi:10.18311/jnr/2023/32206

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Aromatherapy Massage with Ginger and Sesame Oil on Joint Pain and Stiffness in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

2023· article· en· W4388618767 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmad Nasiri Forg, Somayeh Hayati, Rezvaneh Manzour, Azam Saedikia, Nahid Salehi Mashhad Taraghi, Elham Atabati

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Natural Remedies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicGinger and Zingiberaceae research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVice Chancellor for Research and Technology, Kerman University of Medical SciencesBirjand University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisMassagePhysical therapyWOMACRandomized controlled trialAromatherapySesame oilArthritisRheumatologyClinical trialInternal medicineSesamumAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of aromatherapy massage with ginger and sesame oil on joint pain and stiffness in patients with knee joint osteoarthritis. Methods: This study was performed as a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Ninety patients with osteoarthritis were selected via convenience sampling from patients referring to rheumatology clinics affiliated with Birjand University of Medical Sciences. The subjects were randomly assigned into three groups: massage with oils ginger and sesame, and a control group (no massage). Symptoms were assessed using the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis Scale (WOMAC) index at baseline at three stages after the intervention (immediately, two weeks, and four weeks). Data analysis was performed with SPSS19 using Chisquare, Friedman and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: The findings of the study revealed that the mean pain scores in the ginger and sesame oil groups had a decreasing course before and immediately after the intervention compared to 2 weeks after the intervention. However, the changes in mean score showed an increase again 4 weeks after the intervention (P<0.001). The mean score of joint stiffness in the ginger group suggested a decreasing course before intervention compared to immediately after and two weeks after intervention but showed an increase in changes in the mean score four weeks after intervention (P<0.001). Moreover, the mean score of joint stiffness showed a decreasing course in the sesame group before intervention compared to immediately after intervention but showed an increase in the mean score again two weeks and four weeks after intervention (P<0.001). Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrated that aromatherapy massage with ginger and sesame oils are both effective in improving joint pain and stiffness in patients with osteoarthritis; nonetheless, ginger is more effective in improving joint stiffness in patients with osteoarthritis. Moreover, ginger oil is more stable than sesame oil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Natural RemediesSame topicGinger and Zingiberaceae researchFrench-language works237,207