MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388645780 · doi:10.1177/11795573231212175

Factors affecting the association between maternal adverse childhood experiences and preschool children’s behavioural problems: a systematic review of mediators and moderators

2023· review· en· W4388645780 on OpenAlexaff
Stefan Kurbatfinski, Nicole Letourneau, Deborah Dewey, Andrew F. Hayes, Alix Hayden, Lubna Anis, Aliyah Dosani

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Medicine Insights Psychiatry · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Abuse and Trauma
Canadian institutionsMount Royal UniversityAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsycINFOPsychologyModerationCINAHLContext (archaeology)MediationDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychologyAnxietyMental healthPsychological interventionMEDLINEPsychiatrySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are pernicious events (e.g., physical abuse) that occur before 18 years of age within the household. Mothers’ ACEs are associated intergenerationally with their preschool children’s (two-to-five-year-old) behavioural problems, impacting lifelong mental health trajectories. Mediators (e.g., mental health) may explain how mothers’ ACEs exert their influence on children's behavioural development whereas moderators (e.g., child sex) may affect the strength and direction of the association, revealing potential points of intervention. Therefore, this study aimed to: (1) identify mediators and moderators of this association; and (2) describe and compare moderation and mediation outcomes. Methods This review (#CRD42022307214) extracted data from peer-reviewed literature formally analyzing at least one moderating or mediating variable of the association between maternal ACEs and preschool children’s behavioural problems using MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases (n = 7). Validity was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Results Thirteen full-text studies with moderate-to-high validity were identified. Most studies examined mediating variables, with unanimous support for mediation through maternal depression. The mediating roles of adult attachment styles and anxiety were conflicting. No studies examined environmental factors (e.g., neurotoxins). Conclusions Mothers’ depression is a significant contributor to children’s behavioural problems in the context of ACEs and should be a target of early intervention to prevent lifelong challenges. Future research should focus on examining more moderating variables and consider the roles of environmental factors. More research is needed on the moderating and mediating roles of genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.007
Bibliometrics0.0100.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Medicine Insights PsychiatrySame topicChild Abuse and TraumaFrench-language works237,207