Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueLecture notes in networks and systems · 2023
Typebook
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTélécom ParisUniversity of Colorado Colorado SpringsCollege of Science and Engineering, University of MinnesotaNational Technical University of AthensUniversidade do MinhoRégion NormandieUniversidad de JaénUniversidad de GranadaNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeUniversität ZürichKhalifa University of Science, Technology and ResearchAthens University of Economics and BusinessFerdowsi University of MashhadUniversity of Central FloridaUniversity of Technology SydneyUniversity of GalwayEdinburgh Napier UniversityMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNara Institute of Science and TechnologyUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversity of TorontoUniversité Mohammed V de RabatInternational Institute of Information Technology, HyderabadTrinity College DublinConcordia UniversityUniversität Duisburg-EssenUniversity of Northern ColoradoUniversidad de SevillaCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationUniversidad Politécnica de CartagenaTrường Đại học Bách Khoa Hà NộiUniversité du LuxembourgBoise State UniversityNational Institute of Technology Karnataka, SurathkalUniversité de LorraineUniversidade de AveiroUniversità degli Studi dell'AquilaNational University of IrelandUniversity of DodomaUniversità di BolognaUniversity of North Texas
KeywordsBlockchainPolitical scienceComputer scienceLibrary scienceComputer security
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexNo abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
