MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388646178 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-45155-3

Blockchain and Applications, 5th International Congress

2023· book· en· W4388646178 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLecture notes in networks and systems · 2023
Typebook
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTélécom ParisUniversity of Colorado Colorado SpringsCollege of Science and Engineering, University of MinnesotaNational Technical University of AthensUniversidade do MinhoRégion NormandieUniversidad de JaénUniversidad de GranadaNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeUniversität ZürichKhalifa University of Science, Technology and ResearchAthens University of Economics and BusinessFerdowsi University of MashhadUniversity of Central FloridaUniversity of Technology SydneyUniversity of GalwayEdinburgh Napier UniversityMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNara Institute of Science and TechnologyUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversity of TorontoUniversité Mohammed V de RabatInternational Institute of Information Technology, HyderabadTrinity College DublinConcordia UniversityUniversität Duisburg-EssenUniversity of Northern ColoradoUniversidad de SevillaCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationUniversidad Politécnica de CartagenaTrường Đại học Bách Khoa Hà NộiUniversité du LuxembourgBoise State UniversityNational Institute of Technology Karnataka, SurathkalUniversité de LorraineUniversidade de AveiroUniversità degli Studi dell'AquilaNational University of IrelandUniversity of DodomaUniversità di BolognaUniversity of North Texas
KeywordsBlockchainPolitical scienceComputer scienceLibrary scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0850.046

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLecture notes in networks and systemsSame topicBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityFrench-language works237,207