MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388655066 · doi:10.1063/5.0171522

On the bubble trapped underneath a droplet impacting a moving hydrophilic surface: From perfect slip to no slip

2023· article· en· W4388655066 on OpenAlexaff
Jiahao Cheng, Jiguang Hao, Yalei Li, J. M. Floryan

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersOverseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline InnovationNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSlip (aerodynamics)PhysicsMechanicsTerminal velocitySlip line fieldBubbleSlip ratioRelative velocitySlip factorClassical mechanicsThermodynamicsShear stress

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Much experimental evidence supports the commonly held assertion that fluid does not slip along a solid surface. Here, we demonstrate circumstances in which slip occurs. This happens when the fluid velocity relative to the surface is sufficiently large for the acceleration required to prevent the slip cannot be achieved. To demonstrate the slip, we examine the evolution of a bubble trapped underneath a droplet impacting a moving surface and estimate the parameters determining when the slip occurs. We demonstrate that the terminal slip distance, the maximum distance between where the bubble velocity reaches the surface velocity and the impact point, increases with the surface velocity and weakly depends on the Weber number. Its observed length was up to 1.39 mm. An acceleration extracted from the experiments quantifies the slip and provides a simple tool for predicting the terminal slip distance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.867

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207