Honduras HIV cohort: HLA class I and CCR5-Δ32 profiles and their associations with HIV disease outcome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) polymorphisms represent the strongest genetic modifier of HIV disease progression. Diverse HLA distributions can lead to distinct HIV control landscapes at the population level. We aimed to describe HLA allele and haplotype frequencies (linkage disequilibrium, LD), CCR5-Δ32 frequency, and the impact of these variants on HIV disease outcome. HLA class I loci were typed at 4-digit resolution, and CCR5 variants were determined in 402 HIV clade B-infected, antiretroviral treatment-naïve individuals from Honduras. HLA LD was assessed using Fisher’s exact test. Using univariable and multivariable analyses, we evaluated HLA associations with HIV plasma viral load (pVL) and CD4 counts. We did not find any effect on HIV control between CCR5 genotypes. The previously defined HLA associations were found to be B*57:01/03 , B*42:01 , A*25:01 , and C*12:03 (protective) and B*53:01 and A*68:01 (risk). Consistent with our previous research in a Mesoamerican HIV cohort, Amerindian B*35:12 was associated with poor HIV control. Other HLA-HIV associations not previously described were C*03:04 and B*08:01 , which were associated with higher pVL. Overall, this first report highlights the immunogenetic uniqueness of the Honduras population that expresses Amerindian, Caucasian, and African HLA subtypes. These findings not only support this cohort as ideal for identifying HLA correlates of HIV control but also may improve future research regarding allotransplantation and disease association. IMPORTANCE We identify both canonical and novel human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-HIV associations, providing a first step toward improved understanding of HIV immune control among the understudied Honduras Mestizo population. Our results are relevant to understanding the protective or detrimental effects of HLA subtypes in Latin America because their unique HLA diversity poses challenges for designing vaccines against HIV and interpreting results from such vaccine trials. Likewise, the description of the HLA profile in an understudied population that shows a unique HLA immunogenetic background is not only relevant for HIV immunology but also relevant in population genetics, molecular anthropology, susceptibility to other infections, autoimmune diseases, and allograft transplantation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".