MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388669229 · doi:10.53555//sfs.v10i1.1168

Soft Computing Based Sliding Surface Adjustment of Second Order Sliding Mode Controllers: An Application to Ship Steering Model

2023· article· en· W4388669229 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
V P Basheer, Abdul Kareem, Ganesh Aithal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Sliding mode controlRobustness (evolution)Fuzzy logicMATLABController (irrigation)Control engineeringComputer scienceVariable structure controlFuzzy control systemMode (computer interface)EngineeringControl (management)Nonlinear systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work introduces a novel second-order sliding mode (SOSM) controller for the control of dynamicuncertain systems based on fuzzy logic. An efficient sliding surface design approach for improving controllerperformance is to use time-varying sliding surfaces. The proposed controller incorporates second-order slidingmode control, fuzzy logic control, and adaptive control benefits. The proposed controller ensures the system'sreaching conditions, stability, and robustness. The proposed controller is also well-suited for straightforwarddesign and implementation. In order to rotate the sliding surface in a way that improves the trackingperformance of the system under control, this control strategy uses a time-varying slope in the sliding surfacefunction and a straightforward two-input single-output fuzzy logic controller. The proposed controller isstudied with a ship steering model in comparison with a conventional second-order sliding mode controllerwith a fixed sliding surface. Simulations of the ship steering system using MATLAB/SIMULINK show thatthe proposed controller outperforms the typical second-order sliding mode controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207