Protocol Energiemonitor Glastuinbouw : Vernieuwde versie tot en met 2022
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inhoud 1 Inleiding 2 Definities en conceptuele methodiek 2.1 Indicatoren 2.2 Areaal glastuinbouw 2.3 Energie-input en -output 2.4 Sommatie energiesoorten 2.4.1 Energiegebruik 2.4.2CO2-emissie en IPCC-methode 2.4.3Primair brandstofverbruik 2.4.4Duurzame energie 2.4.5 Verkoop van energie 2.4.6 CO2-emissie en elektriciteitsverkoop 2.5 Temperatuurcorrectie 2.6 Elektriciteitsbalans 2.7 Fysieke productie 3 Databronnen en werkwijze 3.1 Benodigde data 3.2 Gebruikte data 3.3 Werkwijze 3.3.1 Energie-input en -output 3.3.2Duurzame energie 3.3.3Energiegebruik 3.3.4CO2-emissie 3.3.5Primair brandstof 3.3.6Temperatuurcorrectie 3.3.7 Elektriciteitsbalans 3.3.8Fysieke productie Bronnen en literatuur Bijlage 1 Inhoudelijke uitwerking splitsing CO2-emissie Bijlage 2 Uitgangspunten en factoren primair brandstof voor inkoop en verkoop elektriciteit en inkoop warmte Bijlage 3 Uitwerking met voorbeeldberekeningen factoren primair brandstof Bijlage 4 Relaties temperatuurcorrectie Bijlage 5 Kwantificering wkk-vermogen tuinders Bijlage
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.214 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it