Dispersion effects in porous medium gravity currents experiencing local drainage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We develop a theoretical model to study (dense) two-dimensional gravity current flow in a laterally extensive porous medium experiencing leakage through a discrete fissure situated along this boundary at some finite distance from the injection point. Our model, which derives from the depth-averaged mass and buoyancy equations in conjunction with Darcy's law, considers dispersive mixing between the gravity current and the surrounding ambient by allowing two different gravity current phases. Thus do we define a bulk phase consisting of fluid whose density is close to that of the source fluid and a dispersed phase consisting of fluid whose density is close to that of the ambient. We characterize the degree of dispersion by estimating, as a function of time, the buoyancy of the dispersed phase and the separation distance between the bulk nose and the dispersed nose. On this basis, it can be shown that the amount of dispersion depends on the flow conditions upstream of the fissure, the fissure permeability and the vertical and horizontal extents of the fissure. We also show that dispersion is larger when the gravity current propagates along an inclined barrier rather than along a horizontal barrier. Model predictions are fitted against numerical simulations. The simulations in question are performed using COMSOL and consider different inclination angles and fissure and upstream flow conditions. Our study is motivated by processes related to underground $\mathrm {H}_2$ storage e.g. an irrecoverable loss of $\mathrm {H}_2$ when it is injected into the cushion gas saturating an otherwise depleted natural gas reservoir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".