Temperature effects on the passivity breakdown of copper in chloride‐containing borate buffer solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Passivity and passivity breakdown of pure copper were studied in alkaline chloride‐containing borate buffer solution from 25°C to 80°C by electrochemical measurements and scanning electron microscopy. The corresponding E–pH diagrams were also calculated. Increased temperatures make the open circuit potential and formation potential for cuprous oxide (Cu2O) shift in a negative direction. The mean breakdown potential shifts in a positive direction and the distribution of breakdown potential has a wider width, while the minimum breakdown potential decreases slightly at higher temperature. The anodic passive film formed at 0.4 V versus Ag/AgCl for 6 h in a chloride‐free solution at T ≥ 40°C can maintain passivity after the addition of 0.1 M NaCl, but cannot maintain passivity at 25°C at the same concentration. High temperature benefits the growth of copper oxide over the formation of copper chloride species. Cu2O and CuO have excellent corrosion resistance to 0.1 M NaCl and passivity can be maintained well above the CuO/Cu2O equilibrium at pH > 8.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".