Investigation of the Dosimetry Characteristics of the GAFCHROMIC® EBT3 Film Response to Alpha Particle Irradiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric characteristics of the GAFCHROMIC® EBT3 film responding to alpha particle irradiation. Unlaminated GAFCHROMIC® EBT3 film pieces, were irradiated with a 30.055 kBq 241Am alpha source, at eight different dose levels, between 0 and 509 Gy. The irradiations were performed inside an enclosed box. Epson Expression 10000 XL scanner in transmission mode was used to digitize irradiated films 24 hours post-irradiations as 16-bit RGB images in tagged image file format (TIFF). Optical density (OD) values were obtained by following the OD theorem. Raw and normalized pixel values (PVnorm) from the red, green, and blue colour channels were sampled from a 3 × 3 mm2 region of interest. Calibration curves were created for both data sets (OD and PVnorm) and were fit accordingly. Monte Carlo simulations with the Geant4 toolkit were performed to establish a dose rate at the point within the sensitive layer of the film. An alpha dosimetry protocol for EBT3 films was obtained from the Monte Carlo calculated dose rate and dose calibration curves for alpha radiation were created. It is necessary to extend this study for different film types and compare to photon dosimetry calibration curves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".