MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388700735 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v26i4.a02

Development of Matrix Based Single Equation to Compute OC-SC Tests Parameters for 1-Phase Transformer

2023· article· en· W4388700735 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dharmasa, A. Ambikapathy, Uma Maheswara M. Rao, Srinivas G. Rao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingle phaseTransformerMatrix (chemical analysis)Computer scienceMaterials scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringComposite materialVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transformer is an efficient asset, which is used mainly to step up-step down voltage levels in a power system and it is necessary to find its performance parameters such as efficiency and voltage regulation.These OC-SC tests are very effective in finding the regulation and efficiency of a transformer at any load (without loading the transformer) under any power factor condition.Previously, OC and SC experiments were conducted to obtain the excitation and core components of 1-phase transformer using more equations.For that in the proposed method, first TWO matrices based equations are developed separately to obtain excitation resistance(R0) and reactance (X0), primary equivalent core resistance (R01) and reactance (X0) for 1-phase transformer these tests.Then combined these TWO matrices based equations are reduced to SINGLE equation, which is sufficient to obtain OC-SC test results.Further, conventional and newly developed equations for OC-SC tests are compared taking experimental data.The proposed, a single equation contains unit matrix (having 0 and 1) of 4*4 order.The reading of OC-SC tests is easily fix to compute parameters like R0 plus X0, (excitation components) R01 plus X01(core components).The developed Single matrix based equation easy to obtain R0, X0, R01 and X01 in the MATLAB format.Calculation time of students, on these R0, X0, R01 and X01 is compared to previous relations and plotted the efficiency versus % load and power factor versus regulation for 1-phase transformer to validate the result.Overall the single matrix equation based procedure results are very effective for OC-SC tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicPower Transformer Diagnostics and InsulationFrench-language works237,207