Bibliographic record
Abstract
This fall marks ASTRO's Advances in Radiation Oncology's eighth year of publishing. The journal continues to grow in readership. Our CiteScore continues to increase over prior years and is currently 4.5 (Fig. 1). Advances received its first impact this year with a value of 2.3. Advances was commissioned in 2015 as a complementary journal to provide a forum for quality research in addition to the Red Journal and PRO, which have a finite number of pages available to publish articles. Figure 2 shows the relative positioning of each of ASTRO's journals in relation to the others. As always, Advances remains freely available to the global oncology community and our patients and their advocates. We currently are seeking critical review articles. However, review articles of interest to the general readership of Advances are also of interest. Potential authors can submit a “presubmission inquiry” for review through the Advances manuscript system.Figure 4Robert Miller, MD, MBA, editor in chief, and Jillian Tsai, MD, PhD, deputy editor in chief.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) Our most downloaded paper (Fig. 3) at this time is a paper on delineation of target volumes using magnetic resonance imaging from Paczona et al1Paczona VR Capala ME Deák-Karancsi B et al.Magnetic resonance imaging-based delineation of organs at risk in the head and neck region.Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022; 8101042Google Scholar and is included in this collection.1Paczona VR Capala ME Deák-Karancsi B et al.Magnetic resonance imaging-based delineation of organs at risk in the head and neck region.Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022; 8101042Google Scholar Also included in this special print edition are two other manuscripts focusing on treatment planning and delivery. Schiff et al2Schiff JP Zhao T Huang Y et al.Simulation-free radiation therapy: An emerging form of treatment planning to expedite plan generation for patients receiving palliative radiation therapy.Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022; 8101091Google Scholar report on a novel simulation-free approach to expediting palliative radiation therapy administration. Orton and colleagues3Orton E Ali E Mayorov K et al.A contouring strategy and reference atlases for the full abdominopelvic bowel bag on treatment planning and cone beam computed tomography images.Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022; 7101031PubMed Google Scholar present a practical contouring strategy for delineating small bowel encompassing both the abdominal and pelvic spaces. Also included is a review of the safety and tolerability of metastasis-directed radiation therapy by Guimond et al.4Guimond E Tsai CJ Hosni A O'Kane G Yang J Barry A Safety and tolerability of metastasis-directed radiation therapy in the era of evolving systemic, immune, and targeted therapies.Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022; 7101022PubMed Google Scholar Advances is committed to diversity and inclusion on the editorial team. Robert C. Miller and C. Jillian Tsai report income from ASTRO.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".