MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388721457 · doi:10.3389/fspas.2023.1184171

Heliophysics and amateur radio: citizen science collaborations for atmospheric, ionospheric, and space physics research and operations

2023· article· en· W4388721457 on OpenAlexaff
N. A. Frissell, John R. Ackermann, Jesse N. Alexander, Robert L. Benedict, William C. Blackwell, Rachel Boedicker, S A Cerwin, Kristina Collins, Scott H. Cowling, Chris Deacon, Devin Diehl, Francesca Di Mare, Timothy J. Duffy, L. Edson, William Engelke, James O. Farmer, Rachel Frissell, Robert B. Gerzoff, John Gibbons, Gwyn Griffiths, Sverre Holm, Frank M. Howell, Stephen Kaeppler, George Kavanagh, David Kazdan, Hyomin Kim, David R. Larsen, Vincent Ledvina, William Liles, Sam Lo, Michael A. Lombardi, E. MacDonald, Julius Madey, Thomas McDermott, David G. McGaw, Robert McGwier, Gary Mikitin, E. S. Miller, Cathryn N. Mitchell, Aidan Montare, Cuong D. Nguyen, Peter N. Nordberg, G. W. Perry, Gerard Piccini, Stanley W. Pozerski, Robert H. Reif, Jonathan Rizzo, Robert S. Robinett, Veronica Romanek, Diego F. Sánchez, Muhammad Sarwar, Jay Schwartz, H. Lawrence Serra, H. Ward Silver, Tamitha Mulligan Skov, David Swartz, David R. Themens, Francis Tholley, Mary Lou West, Ronald C. Wilcox, David Witten, Ben A. Witvliet, Nisha Yadav

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNuclear Safety and Security CommissionNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationAustralian Research Data CommonsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAmateurCitizen scienceSpace weatherSpace ScienceRadio ScienceInstrumentation (computer programming)Radio propagationPhysicsIonosphereRemote sensingData scienceComputer scienceMeteorologyGeographyAstronomyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The amateur radio community is a global, highly engaged, and technical community with an intense interest in space weather, its underlying physics, and how it impacts radio communications. The large-scale observational capabilities of distributed instrumentation fielded by amateur radio operators and radio science enthusiasts offers a tremendous opportunity to advance the fields of heliophysics, radio science, and space weather. Well-established amateur radio networks like the RBN, WSPRNet, and PSKReporter already provide rich, ever-growing, long-term data of bottomside ionospheric observations. Up-and-coming purpose-built citizen science networks, and their associated novel instruments, offer opportunities for citizen scientists, professional researchers, and industry to field networks for specific science questions and operational needs. Here, we discuss the scientific and technical capabilities of the global amateur radio community, review methods of collaboration between the amateur radio and professional scientific community, and review recent peer-reviewed studies that have made use of amateur radio data and methods. Finally, we present recommendations submitted to the U.S. National Academy of Science Decadal Survey for Solar and Space Physics (Heliophysics) 2024–2033 for using amateur radio to further advance heliophysics and for fostering deeper collaborations between the professional science and amateur radio communities. Technical recommendations include increasing support for distributed instrumentation fielded by amateur radio operators and citizen scientists, developing novel transmissions of RF signals that can be used in citizen science experiments, developing new amateur radio modes that simultaneously allow for communications and ionospheric sounding, and formally incorporating the amateur radio community and its observational assets into the Space Weather R2O2R framework. Collaborative recommendations include allocating resources for amateur radio citizen science research projects and activities, developing amateur radio research and educational activities in collaboration with leading organizations within the amateur radio community, facilitating communication and collegiality between professional researchers and amateurs, ensuring that proposed projects are of a mutual benefit to both the professional research and amateur radio communities, and working towards diverse, equitable, and inclusive communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Astronomy and Space SciencesSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207