MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388731836 · doi:10.2217/fnl-2023-0018

The Effects of Lemborexant on Insomnia-Related Fatigue: A Plain Language Summary

2023· article· en· W4388731836 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Craig Chepke, Rakesh Jain, Russell Rosenberg, Margaret Moline, Jane Yardley, Kate Pinner, Dinesh Kumar, Carlos Perdomo, Gleb Filippov, Norman Atkins, Manoj Malhotra

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Neurology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAcadia UniversityTeva Pharmaceutical Industries
KeywordsInsomniaPlaceboMedicinePsychologyPsychiatryPhysical therapyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

What is this summary about? This is a summary of an article originally published in the journal Postgraduate Medicine. Lemborexant is a type of medication called a dual orexin receptor antagonist (often abbreviated to DORA) that is approved for treating people with insomnia, a sleep disorder in which people have trouble falling asleep, staying asleep or both. Two studies, one called SUNRISE-1 (Study 304), which lasted one month, and SUNRISE-2 (Study 303), which lasted 12 months, looked at the effects of lemborexant on sleep compared to placebo in people with insomnia. People with insomnia often experience fatigue (or tiredness) during the daytime, which affects their daily lives and health, and often have other conditions which can also cause fatigue. This summary reports an analysis that looked at whether lemborexant improves fatigue during the daytime as well as nighttime symptoms of insomnia in all participants and in participants with clinically significant fatigue before treatment. What were the results? In both studies, participants completed a questionnaire, called the Fatigue Severity Scale, that measured how significant their fatigue was. The researchers looked at the change in fatigue over time in participants treated with lemborexant compared with those given placebo. They also looked at the change in a group of participants who reported clinically important levels of fatigue at the beginning of the study. People in these studies also completed diaries about how long it took them to fall asleep and how long they slept. The researchers compared improvements in fatigue with changes in how participants slept over time. Overall, lemborexant reduced daytime fatigue compared with placebo in all study participants. It also reduced daytime fatigue in the smaller group of participants who had clinically significant fatigue at the beginning of the study. The reductions in fatigue seen with lemborexant remained during 1 year of treatment. There was also a relationship between reduced fatigue, falling asleep faster and not waking up as much. What do the results mean? Researchers concluded that in addition to improving sleep in people with insomnia, lemborexant can reduce daytime fatigue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuture NeurologySame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207