MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388735527 · doi:10.1007/s44282-023-00019-3

Divergent experiences of Syrian refugee girls in Tripoli, Lebanon: a cross-sectional analysis to inform response and programming

2023· article· en· W4388735527 on OpenAlexaff
Nour Bakhache, Victoria Delisle, Saja Michael, Colleen Davison, Susan A. Bartels

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Global Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeePost-hoc analysisSyrian refugeesCross-sectional studyGeographyMiddle EastDemographyPsychologyMedicineSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background In prior studies exploring the experiences of Syrian refugee girls in Tripoli, Beqaa, and Beirut, especially in relation to child marriage, our data showed distinct variations in response patterns from Tripoli relative to the other regions. To gain a deeper understanding of these contrasting experiences and to ascertain the unique needs of Syrian refugees in Tripoli, we conducted a mixed-methods analysis. Methods We conducted a mixed-methods, cross-sectional study in Lebanon in July–August 2016 using Cognitive Edge’s SenseMaker®. Participants were self-identified Syrian refugees and Lebanese men aged 14 and older. For dyad questions, Kruskal–Wallis H tests with chi-squared statistics compared different geographic subgroups and post-hoc Fisher’s Least Squares Difference analysis identified which groups differed. For triad data, geometric means and 95% confident ellipses were used to compare subgroups. Qualitative analysis of narratives from Tripoli complemented the quantitative results. Results We collected 1422 narratives from 1346 unique participants, including 464 participants from Tripoli. From the quantitative data, three significant response pattern differences between participants in Tripoli and participants in other locations were noted: (a) Syrian fathers in Tripoli perceived that additional programs/services were needed to support Syrian girls, (b) men in Tripoli reported that financial insecurity had contributed to the experiences of Syrian girls, and (c) Syrian girls and mothers in Tripoli perceived that girls were ‘protected too much’. These differences may be driven by the economic and political subnational differences unique to Tripoli. Conclusions Our subnational analysis identified a need for programs and services, financial security, and safety for Syrian girls in Tripoli. Different perspectives in Tripoli highlight that the experiences, concerns, and needs of Syrian refugees in Lebanon are not homogenous across locations. Localized contextualization is needed to guide the development of tailored approaches to support and to inform the distribution of resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscover Global SocietySame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207