MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388794333 · doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c04881

Inverse Modeling Revealed Reversed Trends in HCFC-141b Emissions for China during 2018–2020

2023· article· en· W4388794333 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yahui Sun, Bo Yao, Xiaoyi Hu, Yang Yang, Bowei Li, Mengyue Ma, Wenxue Chi, Qianna Du, Jianxin Hu, Xuekun Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceChinaOzoneAtmospheric sciencesGreenhouse gasClimatologyMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Having the highest ozone-depleting potential among hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), the production and consumption of HCFC-141b (1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane, CH 3 CCl 2 F) are controlled by the Montreal Protocol. A renewed rise in global HCFC-141b emissions was found during 2017–2020; however, the latest changes in emissions across China are unclear for this period. This study used the FLEXible PARTicle dispersion model and the Bayesian framework to quantify HCFC-141b emissions based on atmospheric measurements from more sites across China than those used in previous studies. Results show that the estimated HCFC-141b emissions during 2018–2020 were on average 19.4 (17.3–21.6) Gg year –1, which was 3.9 (0.9–7.0) Gg year –1 higher than those in 2017 (15.5 [13.4–17.6] Gg year –1 ), showing a renewed rise. The proportion of global emissions that could not be exactly traced in 2020 was reduced from about 70% reported in previous studies to 46% herein. This study reconciled the global emission rise of 3.0 ± 1.2 Gg year –1 (emissions in 2020 – emissions in 2017): China’s HCFC-141b emissions changed by 4.3 ± 4.5 Gg year –1, and the combined emissions from North Korea, South Korea, western Japan, Australia, northwestern Europe, and the United States changed by −2.2 ± 2.6 Gg year –1, while those from other countries/regions changed by 0.9 ± 5.3 Gg year –1 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & Technology→Same topicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate→French-language works237,207→