Falsifiable analog model predictions of W mass in CDF II and ATLAS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The CDF II measurement of [Formula: see text] boson mass is at significant ([Formula: see text]) tension with the Standard Model, and moderate ([Formula: see text]) tension with recent results from ATLAS. Any attempt to interpret this as a signature of new physics requires high-precision, robust, falsifiable predictions. The Classical Analogue to the Standard Model In pseudo-Riemannian space–time (CASMIR) is an analogue model predicting [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] boson masses of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], respectively. During baryon collisions satisfying [Formula: see text], CASMIR predicts a color-mediated enhancement of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] boson masses, becoming [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], respectively. The unenhanced masses are consistent with ATLAS data collected at [Formula: see text], and the enhanced masses are consistent with CDF II data collected at [Formula: see text]. According to CASMIR, operation of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at center-of-mass energies small compared with [Formula: see text] but large enough for [Formula: see text] boson formation should permit ATLAS to replicate the result from CDF II.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".