MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388819646 · doi:10.1109/mwc.002.2300041

Liquid Crystal-Based RIS for VLC Transmitters: Performance Analysis, Challenges, and Opportunities

2023· article· en· W4388819646 on OpenAlexaff
Sylvester Aboagye, Telex M. N. Ngatched, Alain R. Ndjiongue, Octavia A. Dobre, Hyundong Shin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandMcMaster UniversityYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisible light communicationTransmitterComputer scienceCommunications systemElectronic engineeringBlock (permutation group theory)TelecommunicationsLight-emitting diodeComputer hardwareOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a novel approach using reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs) in the transmitter of indoor visible light communication (VLC) systems to enhance data rate uniformity and maintain adequate illumination. In this approach, a liquid crystal (LC)-based RIS is placed in front of the LED arrays of the transmitter to form an LC-based RIS-enabled VLC transmitter. This RIS-enabled transmitter is able to perform new functions such as transmit light steering and amplification, and demonstrates very high data rate and illumination performance when compared with traditional VLC transmitters with circular and distributed LED arrays and the more recent angle diversity transmitter. Simulation results reveal the strong potential of LC-based RIS-aided transmitters in satisfying the joint illumination and communication needs of indoor VLC systems, and position VLC as a critical essential block for next generation communication networks. Several challenging and exciting issues related to the realization of such transmitters are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Wireless CommunicationsSame topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207