Phantom fluid cosmology: Impact of a phantom hidden sector on cosmological observables
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phantom scalar theories are widely considered in cosmology, but rarely at the quantum level, where they give rise to negative-energy ghost particles. These cause decay of the vacuum into gravitons and photons, violating observational gamma-ray limits unless the ghosts are effective degrees of freedom with a cutoff $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$ at the few-MeV scale. We update the constraints on this scale, finding that $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\ensuremath{\lesssim}19\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$. We further explore the possible coupling of ghosts to a light, possibly massless, hidden sector particle, such as a sterile neutrino. Vacuum decays can then cause the dark matter density of the universe to grow at late times. The combined phantom plus dark matter fluid has an effective equation of state $w<\ensuremath{-}1$, and functions as a new source of dark energy. We derive constraints from cosmological observables on the rate of vacuum decay into such a phantom fluid. We find a mild preference for the ghost model over the standard cosmological one, and a modest amelioration of the Hubble and ${S}_{8}$ tensions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".