Identification of QTLs for resistance to 10 pathotypes of Plasmodiophora brassicae in Brassica oleracea cultivar ECD11 through genotyping-by-sequencing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Key message Two major quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and five minor QTLs for 10 pathotypes were identified on chromosomes C01, C03, C04 and C08 through genotyping-by-sequencing from Brassica oleracea. Abstract Clubroot caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae is an important disease in brassica crops. Managing clubroot disease of canola on the Canadian prairie is challenging due to the continuous emergence of new pathotypes. Brassica oleracea is considered a major source of quantitative resistance to clubroot. Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) was performed in the parental lines; T010000DH3 (susceptible), ECD11 (resistant) and 124 BC1 plants. A total of 4769 high-quality polymorphic SNP loci were obtained and distributed on 9 chromosomes of B. oleracea. Evaluation of 124 BC1S1 lines for resistance to 10 pathotypes: 3A, 2B, 5C, 3D, 5G, 3H, 8J, 5K, 5L and 3O of P. brassicae, was carried out. Seven QTLs, 5 originating from ECD11 and 2 from T010000DH3, were detected. One major QTL designated as Rcr_C03-1 on C03 contributed 16.0–65.6% of phenotypic variation explained (PVE) for 8 pathotypes: 2B, 5C, 5G, 3H, 8J, 5K, 5L and 3O. Another major QTL designated as Rcr_C08-1 on C08 contributed 8.3 and 23.5% PVE for resistance to 8J and 5K, respectively. Five minor QTLs designated as Rcr_C01-1, Rcr_C03-2, Rcr_C03-3, Rcr_C04-1 and Rcr_C08-2 were detected on chromosomes C01, C03, C04 and C08 that contributed 8.3–23.5% PVE for 5 pathotypes each of 3A, 2B, 3D, 8J and 5K. There were 1, 10 and 4 genes encoding TIR-NBS-LRR/CC-NBS-LRR class disease resistance proteins in the Rcr_C01-1, Rcr_C03-1 and Rcr_C08-1 flanking regions. The syntenic regions of the two major QTLs Rcr_C03-1 and Rcr_C08-1 in the B. rapa genome ‘Chiifu’ were searched.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".