MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388870585 · doi:10.3201/eid2912.230373

Naturally Acquired Rabies in White-Eared Opossum, Brazil

2023· article· en· W4388870585 on OpenAlexaff
Eduardo Ferreira‐Machado, Juliana Amorim Conselheiro, Bruno Emerson Bernardes da Silva, Patrícia Sayuri Silvestre Matsumoto, C. Castagna, Aline Nitsche, Celino Simão de Lima, Douglas Presotto, Madelline Christie Rodrigues Nunes da Silva, Ticiana Brasil Ervedosa, Pedro Enrique Navas‐Suárez, Ísis Paixão de Jesus, Júlia de Carvalho, Rodrigo Albergaria Réssio, Cinthya dos Santos Cirqueira, Gisely Toledo Barone, Leilla del Castillo Saad, Paulo Eduardo Brandão, José Luiz Catão‐Dias, Juliana Mariotti Guerra, Natália Coelho Couto de Azevedo Fernandes

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerging infectious diseases · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicRabies epidemiology and control
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsRabiesOpossumGeographyWildlifeDisease reservoirBiologyZoologyVirologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

R abies is a viral zoonosis with high mortality rates caused by Lyssavirus rabies lineages (rabies virus, RABV) (1).Opossums of the genus Didelphis are marsupials widely distributed in the Americas, synanthropic in urban scenarios, and considered resistant to RABV (2).The main urban reservoirs of RABV in Brazil are nonhematophagous bats with distinct lineages and epidemiologic aspects (3).In 2021, passive surveillance programs detected an unusual case of rabies in a white-eared opossum (D. albiventris) by a RABV lineage of frugivorous bats of genus Artibeus spp. in Campinas, São Paulo state, Brazil, the 10th most urbanized city in the country (4).To elucidate the dynamics of this spillover, we describe the results of passive surveillance for rabies in bats and opossums in Campinas in 2021. The StudyIn 2021, we tested samples of frozen brain tissue from 930 bats and 22 opossums for rabies by direct fluorescent antibody test and confirmed infection by virus isolation in cell culture (5) in Campinas.Fixed formalin brain tissue fragments in 15 of these 22 opossums were analyzed by histopathology.In addition, for the opossum that tested positive for rabies, we performed reverse transcription PCR and subsequent phylogenetic analysis of the glycoprotein gene of RABV in the frozen brain tissue and conducted immunohistochemical analysis for rabies in fixed formalin tissues (cerebrum, cerebellum, heart, lungs, liver, spleen, kidney, and adrenal glands) (Appendix 1, https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/EID/article/29/12/23-0373-App1.pdf;Appendix 2, https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/EID/article/29/12/23-0373-App2.xlsx

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerging infectious diseasesSame topicRabies epidemiology and controlFrench-language works237,207