Performance of Adults After Stroke with and Without Aphasia on Neupsilin-L
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analisaram-se as propriedades psicométricas preliminares do Instrumento de Avaliação Neuropsicolinguística Breve NEUPSILIN-L, em pacientes com e sem afasia expressiva. Participaram 94 adultos, sendo 11 com lesão cerebral no hemisfério direito (LHD), 38 no hemisfério esquerdo (LHE) e 45 neurologicamente saudáveis. O grupo com LHE apresentou os menores escores, principalmente nas tarefas de linguagem, em relação aos demais grupos, assim como a amostra com afasia. Grupos clínicos apresentaram melhor desempenho no NEUPSILIN-L nas tarefas com opções de resposta motora, em relação às respostas orais. Os itens do NEUPSILIN-L apresentaram alpha de Cronbach de alpha de Cronbach de 0,931e ômega de McDonald de 0,950. Os resultados dos grupos no NEUPSILIN-L demonstraram que o instrumento apresenta evidências de validade baseadas na relação com critério e alta consistência interna. Estudos futuros pretendem ampliar as evidências de validade do instrumento e oferecer dados normativos para a população brasileira.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".