Pengaruh Kepemimpinan dan Motivasi Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Dinas Pengendalian Penduduk dan Keluarga Berencana Kota Bandar Lampung
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan ingin mengetahui pengaruh kepemimpinan motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai pada Dinas Pengendalian Penduduk dan Keluarga Berencana Kota Bandar Lampung. Penelitian yang dilaksanakan adalah penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif. Penelitian ini menggunakan 33 responden penelitian. Ada tiga variabel dalam penelitian ini yaitu: 2 (dua) variabel bebas (X1 dan X2) dan 1 (satu) variabel terikat dimana kepemimpinan (X1) dan motivasi kerja (X2) sebagai variabel bebas dan kinerja pegawai (Y) sebagai variabel terikat. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data telah berhasil ditemukan jawaban hipotesis yakni sebagai berikut; terdapat pengaruh kepemimpinan (X1) terhadap kinerja pegawai (Y) dengan tingkat pengaruh sebesar 49,9% Terdapat pengaruh motivasi kerja (X2) terhadap kinerja pegawai (Y), dengan tingkat pengaruh sebesar 38,8% Terdapat pengaruh kepemimpinan (X1) dan motivasi kerja (X2) terhadap kinerja pegawai (Y), dengan tingkat pengaruh sebesar 52,8%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".