Differential expression pattern of Bcl-2 family members in B and T cells in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the expression level of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins in B and T cells in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in relation to disease activity and the effect of various Bcl-2 family inhibitors (BH3 mimetics) as potential treatment. METHODS: We included 14 SLE patients, 12 RA patients, and 13 healthy controls to study anti-apoptotic Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, and Mcl-1 expression and cell survival in different B and T cell subsets using stimulation assays and intracellular flow cytometry. Effect of various BH3 mimetics was assessed by cell viability analyses. RESULTS: In SLE, significant differences in Bcl-2 family members were confined to the B cell compartment with decreased induction of Bcl-XL (p ≤ 0.05) and Mcl-1 (p ≤ 0.001) upon CpG stimulation. In RA, we did not observe any differences in expression levels of Bcl-2 family proteins. Expression patterns did not correlate with disease activity apart from decreased induction of Mcl-1 in B cells in active SLE. After in vitro stimulation with CpG, plasmablasts were more viable after treatment with three different BH3 mimetics compared to naïve or memory B cells in control and patient cells. After activation, Mcl-1 inhibition was most effective in reducing plasmablast and T cell viability, however, less in patients than controls. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence for the increased differential expression pattern of Bcl-2 family members in B and T cell subsets of patients with SLE compared to controls. Tested BH3 mimetics showed higher efficacy in controls compared to both autoimmune diseases, though nonsignificant due to low patient numbers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".