MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388912818 · doi:10.22215/cjcr.v10i2.4225

Mental Health of Children: The Dire Global Picture of a Core Human Right

2023· article· en· W4388912818 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Ziba Vaghri, Avishan Ghorbani, Samuel M. Freeze, Mary Ann Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthHuman rightsAccountabilityConvention on the Rights of the ChildContext (archaeology)Political scienceConventionPandemicGlobal healthPromotion (chess)Global mental healthHealth promotionEconomic growthPublic relationsPsychologyMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PsychiatryPoliticsHealth careLawGeographyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the years following the COVID-19 pandemic, children and adolescents around the world continue to experience unprecedented levels of mental health problems. Governments’ failures to protect children from the development of mental health problems, and to treat and mitigate the effects of mental health problems after onset, violates children’s fundamental human rights under Articles 24 and 39 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). As child and youth mental health has become a global health priority, the global accountability systems embedded in the CRC present opportunities to hold governments accountable for their obligations to children and to promote holistic health by improving the conditions of the environments that children are raised in. This paper presents avenues for child mental health promotion through the human rights and policy framework and pays particular attention to the Canadian context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.545
Threshold uncertainty score0.915

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.019
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0040.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfantsSame topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207